<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Webmail Upgrade for the Grid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.mediatemple.net/2007/07/19/webmail-upgrade-for-the-grid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/2007/07/19/webmail-upgrade-for-the-grid/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:51:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meller</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/2007/07/19/webmail-upgrade-for-the-grid/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/07/19/webmail-upgrade-for-the-grid/#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>Apparently the new design seen in the screenshot is only for the &#039;Simple&#039; versions (both AJAX and non-AJAX). The &#039;Advanced&#039; versions (for either IE or Mozilla) still sport the same look. Had me a bit confused there at first... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently the new design seen in the screenshot is only for the &#8216;Simple&#8217; versions (both AJAX and non-AJAX). The &#8216;Advanced&#8217; versions (for either IE or Mozilla) still sport the same look. Had me a bit confused there at first&#8230; <img src='http://weblog.mediatemple.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McCarthy76</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/2007/07/19/webmail-upgrade-for-the-grid/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>McCarthy76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/07/19/webmail-upgrade-for-the-grid/#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>Good job! It seems alot faster that the previous version. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job! It seems alot faster that the previous version. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogelio</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/2007/07/19/webmail-upgrade-for-the-grid/#comment-1111</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogelio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/07/19/webmail-upgrade-for-the-grid/#comment-1111</guid>
		<description>excellent!

now i hope soon we can customize the login screen, that wold be a grat plus for us using our (your) @Mail !!

And the ability to create a catch-all email on the grid.

Keep that Good Work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent!</p>
<p>now i hope soon we can customize the login screen, that wold be a grat plus for us using our (your) @Mail !!</p>
<p>And the ability to create a catch-all email on the grid.</p>
<p>Keep that Good Work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (mt) DF</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/2007/07/19/webmail-upgrade-for-the-grid/#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>(mt) DF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/07/19/webmail-upgrade-for-the-grid/#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>Great question Andre. The reason we&#039;re on 5.0.4 has to do with the number of customizations we have to make to the @mail software in order for it to function correctly on the Grid. Implementing all of these customizations combined with the rapid pace the @mail team releases new versions is the reason why we&#039;re going to be a few rev levels behind @mail releases. If it was a drop-in replacement things might be different, but in this case it&#039;s not. I hope that answers your question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question Andre. The reason we&#8217;re on 5.0.4 has to do with the number of customizations we have to make to the @mail software in order for it to function correctly on the Grid. Implementing all of these customizations combined with the rapid pace the @mail team releases new versions is the reason why we&#8217;re going to be a few rev levels behind @mail releases. If it was a drop-in replacement things might be different, but in this case it&#8217;s not. I hope that answers your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Gagnon</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/2007/07/19/webmail-upgrade-for-the-grid/#comment-1110</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Gagnon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/07/19/webmail-upgrade-for-the-grid/#comment-1110</guid>
		<description>Ummm, Question. Isn&#039;t @Mail now at version 5.06? I don&#039;t want to sound like I&#039;m nagging or anything why not just upgrade to the latest version?

More of this @:
http://blog.atmail.com/?p=59</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm, Question. Isn&#8217;t @Mail now at version 5.06? I don&#8217;t want to sound like I&#8217;m nagging or anything why not just upgrade to the latest version?</p>
<p>More of this @:<br />
<a href="http://blog.atmail.com/?p=59" rel="nofollow">http://blog.atmail.com/?p=59</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

