<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Breed of (dv) Servers?</title>
	<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/</link>
	<description>(mt) Web log including various communications.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: chl</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-16263</link>
		<dc:creator>chl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-16263</guid>
		<description>Todd Nine -

Thanks for the input. In regards to subversion, our customers have had success on the current (dv) platform using the packages you can find here:

http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/subversion/

that are build for the RHEL4 line. Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd Nine -</p>
<p>Thanks for the input. In regards to subversion, our customers have had success on the current (dv) platform using the packages you can find here:</p>
<p><a href="http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/subversion/" rel="nofollow">http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/subversion/</a></p>
<p>that are build for the RHEL4 line. Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Nine</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-16046</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Nine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 04:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-16046</guid>
		<description>I'm also looking for CentOS 5.  Mostly for ruby 1.8.5 without the need for a development yum repo.  I also really need subversion 1.2 or newer since I use Red mine as my project management software.  I can't seem to get subversion 1.4 to "play nice" on centos 4.4 with the latest compiled modules.  Has anyone got it to work with the collabnet rpms here?

http://downloads.open.collab.net/collabnet-subversion.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also looking for CentOS 5.  Mostly for ruby 1.8.5 without the need for a development yum repo.  I also really need subversion 1.2 or newer since I use Red mine as my project management software.  I can&#8217;t seem to get subversion 1.4 to &#8220;play nice&#8221; on centos 4.4 with the latest compiled modules.  Has anyone got it to work with the collabnet rpms here?</p>
<p><a href="http://downloads.open.collab.net/collabnet-subversion.html" rel="nofollow">http://downloads.open.collab.net/collabnet-subversion.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chukaman</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-15475</link>
		<dc:creator>chukaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 19:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-15475</guid>
		<description>We would switch our server to Ubuntu if you added that. We would even use Ubuntu LTS but would prefer the latest greatest Ubuntu of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We would switch our server to Ubuntu if you added that. We would even use Ubuntu LTS but would prefer the latest greatest Ubuntu of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chl</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-15008</link>
		<dc:creator>chl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-15008</guid>
		<description>Johnny - First off thanks for all your hard work on CentOS. We're big fans of the project here at (mt).

We do know that CentOS-5 is out, and there are templates available for it for our virtualization platform. However, Plesk is not going to support it until the next version of Plesk 8 which is due out sometime Soon (tm). Since the large majority of our customers need a control panel such as this, we aren't offering VPS's based on CentOS-5 just yet. But, we will certainly be keeping an eye on things once those CentOS-5 Plesk templates become available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnny - First off thanks for all your hard work on CentOS. We&#8217;re big fans of the project here at (mt).</p>
<p>We do know that CentOS-5 is out, and there are templates available for it for our virtualization platform. However, Plesk is not going to support it until the next version of Plesk 8 which is due out sometime Soon &#8482;. Since the large majority of our customers need a control panel such as this, we aren&#8217;t offering VPS&#8217;s based on CentOS-5 just yet. But, we will certainly be keeping an eye on things once those CentOS-5 Plesk templates become available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Hughes</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-15000</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 10:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-15000</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to point out that CentOS-5 is now released ... it has all the things people are asking for (php-5, mysql-5, apache-2.2, mod_perl-2, etc.) and it is stable ... supported for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to point out that CentOS-5 is now released &#8230; it has all the things people are asking for (php-5, mysql-5, apache-2.2, mod_perl-2, etc.) and it is stable &#8230; supported for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karanbir Singh</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-14999</link>
		<dc:creator>Karanbir Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 10:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-14999</guid>
		<description>Hi Guys,

Firstly, great to see CentOS being used all around!

Secondly, CentOS does have the CentOSPlus repository of packages, where Mysql-5, php-5 pgsql-8 etc have been available for a long time  and all of the other packages mentioned in this conversation so far, are available directly from trusted second party repositories ( http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories )

- KB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guys,</p>
<p>Firstly, great to see CentOS being used all around!</p>
<p>Secondly, CentOS does have the CentOSPlus repository of packages, where Mysql-5, php-5 pgsql-8 etc have been available for a long time  and all of the other packages mentioned in this conversation so far, are available directly from trusted second party repositories ( <a href="http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories</a> )</p>
<p>- KB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hoeppner</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-13979</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hoeppner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 16:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-13979</guid>
		<description>It's not that I prefer "bleeding-edge" over "stable", but I have been running a ubuntu based box for pretty long at home for development and some friend-circle based hosting, and it has been working very well. It may not be as "stable" as your CentOS OS template, but it really does it's job, and is pretty up to date.

Plus, the only thing I really don't get the grasp of is DNS configuration. So if there was some way to abstract it I would even ask you to get me a blank box with only sshd enabled. I would take care of the rest. This should be an available option anyways, since you guys don't provide support on software.

My $0.02</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that I prefer &#8220;bleeding-edge&#8221; over &#8220;stable&#8221;, but I have been running a ubuntu based box for pretty long at home for development and some friend-circle based hosting, and it has been working very well. It may not be as &#8220;stable&#8221; as your CentOS OS template, but it really does it&#8217;s job, and is pretty up to date.</p>
<p>Plus, the only thing I really don&#8217;t get the grasp of is DNS configuration. So if there was some way to abstract it I would even ask you to get me a blank box with only sshd enabled. I would take care of the rest. This should be an available option anyways, since you guys don&#8217;t provide support on software.</p>
<p>My $0.02</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-13834</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 15:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-13834</guid>
		<description>(mt)'s customer service is great, but I must admit I've often found it frustrating that the (dv) servers run pretty old technology by default. I have a small shared server account elsewhere just for backup, and it's always been running the latest versions of everything -- PHP, MySQL, etc. I know that with a (dv) you can upgrade these at will, but still...

I can understand (mt) reasons for not keeping up to date with some stuff... but things like PHP5 have been out for years!

So, yeah, (dv) servers set up with up to date technology would be great, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(mt)&#8217;s customer service is great, but I must admit I&#8217;ve often found it frustrating that the (dv) servers run pretty old technology by default. I have a small shared server account elsewhere just for backup, and it&#8217;s always been running the latest versions of everything &#8212; PHP, MySQL, etc. I know that with a (dv) you can upgrade these at will, but still&#8230;</p>
<p>I can understand (mt) reasons for not keeping up to date with some stuff&#8230; but things like PHP5 have been out for years!</p>
<p>So, yeah, (dv) servers set up with up to date technology would be great, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Ozmo</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-10200</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Ozmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-10200</guid>
		<description>I am all for keeping up with the Jones's.... I am one for "bleeding-edge" technology.

Fo my business, personally I have no issues with trouble-shooting new systems and configs.... change and challenge is welcome in my house.

Bring on the "New-Breed" I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am all for keeping up with the Jones&#8217;s&#8230;. I am one for &#8220;bleeding-edge&#8221; technology.</p>
<p>Fo my business, personally I have no issues with trouble-shooting new systems and configs&#8230;. change and challenge is welcome in my house.</p>
<p>Bring on the &#8220;New-Breed&#8221; I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David W. Boles</title>
		<link>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-9099</link>
		<dc:creator>David W. Boles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 00:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/04/03/a-new-breed-of-dv-servers/#comment-9099</guid>
		<description>Oh, and if anyone is interested -- here's my blog article detailing why I came back to Media Temple's (dv) 3 hosting after leaving the (dv) 2 to go to Mosso:

http://urbansemiotic.com/2007/03/25/moving-back-to-media-temple-from-mosso/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and if anyone is interested &#8212; here&#8217;s my blog article detailing why I came back to Media Temple&#8217;s (dv) 3 hosting after leaving the (dv) 2 to go to Mosso:</p>
<p><a href="http://urbansemiotic.com/2007/03/25/moving-back-to-media-temple-from-mosso/" rel="nofollow">http://urbansemiotic.com/2007/03/25/moving-back-to-media-temple-from-mosso/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
